©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Sep 27, 2025; 17(9): 108621
Published online Sep 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i9.108621
Published online Sep 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i9.108621
Table 6 Comparison of catheter-related complications between two groups, n (%)
| Single-lumen group (n = 117) | Double-lumen group (n = 132) | t/χ² | P value | |
| Infection rate | 4 (3.42) | 4 (3.03) | 0 | 1 |
| Thrombosis | 1 (0.85) | 9 (6.82) | 4.28 | 0.039 |
| Dislodgement | 3 (2.56) | 4 (3.03) | 0 | 1 |
| Occlusion | 5 (4.27) | 3 (2.27) | 0.285 | 0.594 |
| Total complications | 14 (11.97) | 18 (13.64) | 0.155 | 0.694 |
- Citation: Ye XH, Cui RH, Xu L, Wang MJ, Ye LR, Jiang M. Efficacy of single-lumen and double-lumen peripherally inserted central catheters in patients undergoing digestive surgery within bundled care contexts. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17(9): 108621
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v17/i9/108621.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i9.108621