©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Sep 27, 2025; 17(9): 108621
Published online Sep 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i9.108621
Published online Sep 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i9.108621
Table 5 Comparison of hemodynamic stability during catheterization between two groups
| Single-lumen group (n = 117) | Double-lumen group (n = 132) | t/χ² | P value | |
| Heart rate variation (beats/minute) | 5.40 ± 1.30 | 5.50 ± 1.40 | 0.6 | 0.549 |
| Blood pressure variation (mmHg) | 3.40 ± 1.22 | 3.50 ± 1.30 | 0.588 | 0.557 |
| Oxygen saturation (%) | 98.9 ± 0.53 | 98.87 ± 0.70 | 0.297 | 0.767 |
| Mean arterial pressure (mmHg) | 92 ± 7.09 | 93.51 ± 6.50 | 1.756 | 0.08 |
| Central venous pressure (cmH2O) | 8.02 ± 1.56 | 8.33 ± 1.60 | 1.551 | 0.122 |
- Citation: Ye XH, Cui RH, Xu L, Wang MJ, Ye LR, Jiang M. Efficacy of single-lumen and double-lumen peripherally inserted central catheters in patients undergoing digestive surgery within bundled care contexts. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17(9): 108621
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v17/i9/108621.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i9.108621