©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Sep 27, 2025; 17(9): 108621
Published online Sep 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i9.108621
Published online Sep 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i9.108621
Table 4 Comparison of extended respiratory function tests between two groups
| Single-lumen group (n = 117) | Double-lumen group (n = 132) | t | P value | |
| FEV1 (L) | 3.21 ± 0.58 | 3.15 ± 0.6 | 0.804 | 0.422 |
| FVC (L) | 4.05 ± 0.72 | 4 ± 0.75 | 0.611 | 0.542 |
| FEV1/FVC ratio (%) | 79.26 ± 5.34 | 78.92 ± 5.41 | 0.496 | 0.621 |
| PEF (L/minute) | 480.23 ± 50.12 | 475.89 ± 49.78 | 0.685 | 0.494 |
| DLCO (% predicted) | 85.12 ± 10.25 | 84.78 ± 10.15 | 0.265 | 0.791 |
| Respiratory rate (breaths/minute) | 16.22 ± 2.04 | 16.45 ± 2.10 | 0.873 | 0.383 |
- Citation: Ye XH, Cui RH, Xu L, Wang MJ, Ye LR, Jiang M. Efficacy of single-lumen and double-lumen peripherally inserted central catheters in patients undergoing digestive surgery within bundled care contexts. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17(9): 108621
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v17/i9/108621.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i9.108621