BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Retrospective Study
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Sep 27, 2025; 17(9): 107977
Published online Sep 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i9.107977
Figure 2
Figure 2 Evaluation of the random forest model in the test cohort. A: Receiver operating characteristic curves and area under the curve values for the testing set; B: Confusion matrix for the random forest (RF) model applied to the testing set; C: Comparison of predicted probabilities by the RF model for patients with and without parastomal hernia in the test cohort; D: Decision curve analysis for the test group; E: Calibration curve of the testing set. aP < 0.001 vs control group. AUC: Area under the curve.


Write to the Help Desk