©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Sep 27, 2025; 17(9): 107605
Published online Sep 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i9.107605
Published online Sep 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i9.107605
Table 5 Survey of barriers to the implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery
| Factors | Agree | Neutrality | Disagree |
| The safety and efficacy of accelerated recovery require further validation | 36 | 4 | 2 |
| Multidisciplinary collaboration is lacking within the hospital | 22 | 5 | 15 |
| Implementation is primarily driven by physicians, with other personnel playing supportive roles | 16 | 10 | 16 |
| Deeply ingrained traditional beliefs causes difficulty for healthcare staff to change their perspectives in the short term | 32 | 5 | 5 |
| Variability in individual patient conditions complicates the uniform application of accelerated recovery protocols | 37 | 3 | 2 |
| Concerns on postoperative complications may lead to disputes between patients and healthcare providers | 31 | 10 | 1 |
| Patients may struggle to effectively understand and cooperate with the accelerated recovery process | 26 | 9 | 7 |
| Policy support for the advancement of ERAS is insufficient | 8 | 11 | 23 |
- Citation: Fu XJ, Ren JX, Yuan LL, Hong Y. Application of enhanced recovery after surgery techniques in gastrointestinal surgery patients. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17(9): 107605
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v17/i9/107605.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i9.107605