©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Sep 27, 2025; 17(9): 107605
Published online Sep 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i9.107605
Published online Sep 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i9.107605
Table 1 Comparison of postoperative outcomes between the enhanced recovery after surgery group and the control group
| ERAS group (n = 53) | Control group (n = 62) | t | P value | |
| Time to first ambulation post-surgery (days) | 1.21 | 3.18 | 19.64 | < 0.05a |
| Time to first feeding post-surgery (days) | 1.65 | 5.38 | 19.09 | < 0.05a |
| Duration of abdominal drain placement post-surgery (days) | 4.29 | 5.04 | 3.67 | < 0.05a |
| Duration of urinary catheter placement post-surgery (days) | 1.38 | 2.28 | 8.14 | < 0.05a |
| Length of hospital stay post-surgery (days) | 6.90 | 10.28 | 9.13 | < 0.05a |
| Total hospitalization cost (in ten thousand yuan) | 4.6 | 4.9 | 4.02 | < 0.05a |
| Readmission rate (%) | 1.9 | 3.2 | 0.202 | 0.653 |
- Citation: Fu XJ, Ren JX, Yuan LL, Hong Y. Application of enhanced recovery after surgery techniques in gastrointestinal surgery patients. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17(9): 107605
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v17/i9/107605.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i9.107605