©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Sep 27, 2025; 17(9): 106514
Published online Sep 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i9.106514
Published online Sep 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i9.106514
Table 3 Comparison of postoperative psychological status, satisfaction, and postoperative nausea and vomiting between the two groups, mean ± SD
| Characteristic | Narrative nursing group (n = 59) | Routine nursing group (n = 49) | P value |
| Satisfaction score, median (QL-QU) | 100 (100-100) | 100 (93.5-100) | 0.001 |
| PONV score, median (QL-QU) | 2 (1-2) | 1 (2-3) | 0.863 |
| SAS score, median (QL-QU) | 46 (40-50) | 50 (47.5-60) | 0.001 |
| SDS score | 46.96 ± 7.92 | 53.10 ± 9.43 | 0.001 |
- Citation: Shi LN, Wang L, Gao YB, Ma DH, Mao YL, Wang YQ, Wang Y, Guo QX, He RM, Chen JM. Clinical application value of narrative nursing model in patients undergoing laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17(9): 106514
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v17/i9/106514.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i9.106514