©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Sep 27, 2025; 17(9): 106514
Published online Sep 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i9.106514
Published online Sep 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i9.106514
Table 2 Comparison of postoperative recovery between the two groups
| Characteristic | Narrative nursing group (n = 59) | Routine nursing group (n = 49) | P value |
| VAS (hour), median (QL-QU) | |||
| 12 | 3 (3-4) | 4 (3-5) | 0.001 |
| 24 | 3 (3-4) | 4 (3-5) | 0.003 |
| 48 | 3 (2-3) | 3 (3-4) | 0.033 |
| 72 | 3 (2-3) | 3 (2-4) | 0.028 |
| 96 | 2 (2-2) | 2 (2-3) | 0.004 |
| 120 | 2 (1-2) | 2 (1-2) | 0.243 |
| Time to postoperative flatus (days), median (QL-QU) | 3 (2-3) | 3 (2-3) | 0.720 |
| Time to postoperative defecation (days), median (QL-QU) | 3 (3-3) | 3 (3-3) | 0.208 |
| Time to first postoperative ambulation (days), median (QL-QU) | 1 (1-2) | 1.6 (1-2) | 0.047 |
| Postoperative hospital stay (days), median (QL-QU) | 10 (9-11) | 11 (10-12) | 0.003 |
- Citation: Shi LN, Wang L, Gao YB, Ma DH, Mao YL, Wang YQ, Wang Y, Guo QX, He RM, Chen JM. Clinical application value of narrative nursing model in patients undergoing laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17(9): 106514
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v17/i9/106514.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i9.106514