Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Aug 27, 2025; 17(8): 107340
Published online Aug 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i8.107340
Published online Aug 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i8.107340
Table 2 Risk-adapted surveillance strategy for postoperative stage I-III colorectal cancer patients
Risk category | Imaging (CT/MRI) | Colonoscopy | Biomarker testing (CEA) | Rationale |
High-risk (e.g., stage III, MSS, positive biomarkers) | Every 6 months for years 1-3, annually for years 4-5 (low-dose protocols for patients < 50) | At 1 year post-surgery, then every 3 years if negative | Every 3 months for 3 years, then every 6 months | Higher recurrence risk justifies intensive imaging, balanced with low-dose CT to reduce radiation exposure[6,10,12] |
Intermediate-Risk (e.g., stage II, MSS, negative biomarkers) | Annually for years 1-3, every 2 years for years 4-5 (MRI preferred for patients < 50) | At 1 year, then every 3-5 years if negative | Every 6 months for 3 years, then annually | Moderate risk warrants regular but less frequent imaging, with MRI to minimize radiation in younger patients[10,12] |
Low-risk (e.g., stage I, MSI-H, negative biomarkers) | Every 2 years for years 1-5 (MRI or low-dose CT for patients < 50) | At 1 year, then every 5 years if negative | Annually for 5 years | Lower recurrence risk supports extended intervals, prioritizing radiation reduction[6,10,12] |
- Citation: Han S, Yu LX, Zou HP, Miao YD, Lin SX. Computed tomography-dominant surveillance strategies for colorectal cancer: Improving early detection of recurrence. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17(8): 107340
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v17/i8/107340.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i8.107340