©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Aug 27, 2025; 17(8): 107228
Published online Aug 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i8.107228
Published online Aug 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i8.107228
Table 2 Risk factors for pancreatic fistula, n (%)
| Variables | Technique | P value | |
| DMPJ, n = 34 | BIPJ, n = 33 | ||
| Pancreatic texture of remnant pancreas | 0.162 | ||
| Soft | 26 (76) | 20 (61) | |
| Hard | 8 (24) | 13 (39) | |
| Main pancreatic duct size | 0.393 | ||
| ≤ 3 mm | 15 (44) | 18 (55) | |
| > 3 mm | 19 (56) | 15 (45) | |
| Pancreatic fistula risk classification | 0.447 | ||
| A | 6 (18.2) | 5 (14.7) | |
| B | 7 (21.2) | 3 (8.82) | |
| C | 9 (27.3) | 14 (41.2) | |
| D | 11 (33.3) | 12 (35.3) | |
- Citation: Chen X, Wang CY, Fu RB, Liu ZY, Yin MQ, Zhu JH. Binding and interlocking pancreaticojejunostomy vs duct to mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy: A retrospective cohort study. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17(8): 107228
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v17/i8/107228.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i8.107228