Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Aug 27, 2025; 17(8): 106245
Published online Aug 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i8.106245
Published online Aug 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i8.106245
Table 4 Comparison of coping methods between the two groups, mean ± SD
Group | Cases | Face | Avoid | Surrender | |||
Before | After | Before | After | Before | After | ||
Observation | 41 | 15.78 ± 1.40 | 23.06 ± 1.73a | 14.51 ± 1.24 | 10.77 ± 0.98a | 13.06 ± 1.26 | 8.43 ± 0.77a |
Control | 41 | 15.46 ± 1.33 | 19.77 ± 1.44a | 14.46 ± 1.30 | 12.14 ± 1.03a | 13.17 ± 1.40 | 9.46 ± 0.84a |
t value | 1.061 | 9.359 | 0.178 | 6.170 | 0.374 | 5.788 | |
P value | 0.292 | < 0.001 | 0.859 | < 0.001 | 0.709 | < 0.001 |
- Citation: Yang L, Zhang Q, Wang DH, Zhou Q. Exploration of doctor-patient communication characteristics and optimization path for gastrointestinal surgery of acute abdomen. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17(8): 106245
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v17/i8/106245.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i8.106245