Impact of different skin suturing methods on patient prognosis after ileostomy closure

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 17, Issue 7

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

All Articles published online

Item

Count

PDF

HTML

205

Figures (1-2)

Tables (1-6)

Sum=332

Publishing Process of This Article

Item

Count

Browse

Download

Sum=61

Jul 27, 2025 (publication date) through Aug 11, 2025

Times Cited of This Article

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

ISSN

1948-9366

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Clinical Trials Study

World J Gastrointest Surg. Jul 27, 2025; 17(7): 106560
Published online Jul 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i7.106560

Table 6 Comparison of postoperative safety indicators among the three groups, n (%)

	Purse-string suture group	Cross-suture group	Vertical interrupted suture group	P value
Cases	10	10	10
SSI	0	0	4 (40.00)	0.010
Anastomotic leak	0	0	0	-
Intestinal obstruction	0	0	1 (10.00)	0.355
Incisional hernia	0	0	0	-
Pulmonary infection	2 (20.00)	1 (10.00)	2 (20.00)	0.535
Suture site bleeding	2 (20.00)	2 (20.00)	3 (30.00)	0.830
Death	0	0	0	-

Citation: Gao YB, Wang L, Shi LN, Wu X, Miao W. Impact of different skin suturing methods on patient prognosis after ileostomy closure. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17(7): 106560
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v17/i7/106560.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i7.106560