Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Jul 27, 2025; 17(7): 106560
Published online Jul 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i7.106560
Published online Jul 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i7.106560
Table 4 Comparison of postoperative recovery indicators among the three groups, M (QL-QU)
Purse-string suture group | Cross-suture group | Vertical interrupted suture group | P value | |
Cases | 10 | 10 | 10 | |
Postoperative white blood cell count, 109/L | 6.7950 (5.7675-7.6050) | 5.9150 (5.0250-7.1750) | 6.0050 (4.5525-7.5900) | 0.477 |
Postoperative CRP level, mg/L | 30.5000 (25.0000-37.7500) | 37.0000 (26.0000-42.0000) | 58.0000 (50.0000-70.0000) | 0.000 |
Postoperative hemoglobin level, g/L | 109.5000 (89.7500-132.0000) | 113.5000 (103.0000-120.7500) | 112.0000 (97.2500-120.7500) | 0.935 |
Postoperative albumin level, g/L | 37.5000 (34.7500-41.0000) | 35.6000 (34.0000-37.0000) | 35.5000 (33.7500-37.2500) | 0.290 |
- Citation: Gao YB, Wang L, Shi LN, Wu X, Miao W. Impact of different skin suturing methods on patient prognosis after ileostomy closure. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17(7): 106560
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v17/i7/106560.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i7.106560