Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Jul 27, 2025; 17(7): 106560
Published online Jul 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i7.106560
Published online Jul 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i7.106560
Table 2 Comparison of general data among the three groups, mean ± SD
Purse-string suture group | Cross-suture group | Vertical interrupted suture group | P value | |
Cases | 10 | 10 | 10 | |
Age, years | 58.20 ± | 59.40 | 60.00 ± 14.17 | 0.876 |
Height, m | 1.64 | 1.65 ± 0.07 | 1.64 ± 0.10 | 0.940 |
Weight, kg | 56.65 ± 6.62 | 60.10 ± 6.98 | 60.90 ± 8.3 | 0.402 |
BMI, kg/m2 | 21.01 ± 1.90 | 21.87 ± 1.56 | 22.45 ± 2.52 | 0.298 |
Preoperative albumin level, g/L | 41.23 ± 3.65 | 41.48 ± 2.93 | 42.13 ± 3.68 | 0.834 |
Time interval before reversal, months | 6.40 | 5.60 ± 2.27 | 6.30 ± 1.88 | 0.687 |
- Citation: Gao YB, Wang L, Shi LN, Wu X, Miao W. Impact of different skin suturing methods on patient prognosis after ileostomy closure. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17(7): 106560
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v17/i7/106560.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i7.106560