Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Jul 27, 2025; 17(7): 106560
Published online Jul 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i7.106560
Published online Jul 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i7.106560
Table 1 Comparison of general data among the three groups, n (%)
Purse-string suture group | Cross-suture group | Vertical interrupted suture group | P value | |
Cases | 10 | 10 | 10 | |
Comorbidities | 0.672 | |||
None | 9 (90.00) | 7 (70.00) | 6 (60.00) | |
Hypertension | 1 (10.00) | 2 (20.00) | 2 (20.00) | |
Diabetes | 0 (0.00) | 1 (10.00) | 1 (10.00) | |
Coronary artery disease | 0 (0.00) | 0 (0.00) | 1 (10.00) | |
Primary disease | 0.986 | |||
Colon cancer | 3 (30.00) | 2 (20.00) | 3 (30.00) | |
Rectal cancer | 6 (60.00) | 7 (70.00) | 6 (60.00) | |
Intestinal obstruction | 1 (10.00) | 1 (10.00) | 1 (10.00) | |
Gender | 0.171 | |||
Male | 4 (40.00) | 8 (80.00) | 8 (80.00) | |
Female | 6 (60.00) | 2 (20.00) | 2 (20.00) |
- Citation: Gao YB, Wang L, Shi LN, Wu X, Miao W. Impact of different skin suturing methods on patient prognosis after ileostomy closure. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17(7): 106560
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v17/i7/106560.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i7.106560