Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Jul 27, 2025; 17(7): 106341
Published online Jul 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i7.106341
Published online Jul 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i7.106341
Table 4 Comparison of immune response between the two groups, mean ± SD
| Group | n | IgG (g/L) | IgA (g/L) | IgM (g/L) | |||
| Pre-intervention | Post-intervention | Pre-intervention | Post-intervention | Pre-intervention | Post-intervention | ||
| Research group | 61 | 6.25 ± 0.59 | 8.40 ± 0.87 | 1.32 ± 0.15 | 1.64 ± 0.18 | 1.23 ± 0.11 | 1.51 ± 0.19 |
| Control group | 65 | 6.21 ± 0.68 | 7.31 ± 0.91 | 1.36 ± 0.13 | 1.41 ± 0.13 | 1.20 ± 0.09 | 1.32 ± 0.15 |
| t | - | 0.352 | 6.864 | 1.602 | 8.260 | 1.680 | 6.250 |
| P value | - | 0.726 | < 0.001 | 0.112 | < 0.001 | 0.096 | < 0.001 |
- Citation: Ni SS, Du Y. Effect of graded nutritional intervention on elderly colorectal cancer patients’ postop status. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17(7): 106341
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v17/i7/106341.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i7.106341