Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Jul 27, 2025; 17(7): 106341
Published online Jul 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i7.106341
Published online Jul 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i7.106341
Table 3 Comparison of nutritional status between the two groups, mean ± SD
Group | n | Hb (g/L) | PAB (mg/L) | TRF (g/L) | PG-SGA (points) | ||||
Pre-intervention | Post-intervention | Pre-intervention | Post-intervention | Pre-intervention | Post-intervention | Pre-intervention | Post-intervention | ||
Research group | 61 | 102.33 ± 10.52 | 121.67 ± 13.13 | 152.32 ± 18.71 | 245.54 ± 23.01 | 1.41 ± 0.15 | 2.31 ± 0.20 | 10.29 ± 1.33 | 4.55 ± 0.48 |
Control group | 65 | 104.28 ± 9.47 | 113.46 ± 14.85 | 151.78 ± 16.52 | 210.37 ± 22.41 | 1.42 ± 0.13 | 1.98 ± 0.12 | 10.31 ± 1.48 | 5.81 ± 0.56 |
t | - | 1.095 | 3.279 | 0.172 | 8.690 | 0.401 | 11.311 | 0.080 | 13.519 |
P value | - | 0.276 | 0.001 | 0.864 | < 0.001 | 0.689 | < 0.001 | 0.967 | < 0.001 |
- Citation: Ni SS, Du Y. Effect of graded nutritional intervention on elderly colorectal cancer patients’ postop status. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17(7): 106341
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v17/i7/106341.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i7.106341