Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Jul 27, 2025; 17(7): 105503
Published online Jul 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i7.105503
Published online Jul 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i7.105503
Table 1 Assessment of gastroscopy performance and endoscopic image quality, mean ± SD
Experimental group (n = 10)1 | Control group (n = 10)2 | P value | |
Duration of gastroscopy | 287.33 ± 38.15 | 284.78 ± 70.75 | 0.673 |
Image integrity scores | 30.80 ± 0.42 | 30.90 ± 0.32 | 0.739 |
Image sharpness scores | 30.50 ± 0.71 | 30.80 ± 0.42 | 0.436 |
Image contrast scores | 30.10 ± 1.20 | 30.80 ± 0.42 | 0.218 |
Image brightness scores | 29.67 ± 1.23 | 30.67 ± 0.50 | 0.203 |
- Citation: Zhao CY, Ning B, Feng XX, Li HK, Zhang WG, Dong H, Chai NL, Linghu EQ. Comparison of a portable disposable large-channel gastroscope and a conventional reusable gastroscope in gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17(7): 105503
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v17/i7/105503.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i7.105503