Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Jul 27, 2025; 17(7): 104226
Published online Jul 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i7.104226
Published online Jul 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i7.104226
Table 8 Quality of life, mean ± SD
Group | Case | Good society | Sicchasia | Total point | |||
Before | After | Before | After | Before | After | ||
Control | 42 | 6.18 ± 1.12 | 8.78 ± 0.92a | 6.12 ± 1.16 | 8.72 ± 0.96a | 69.36 ± 9.08 | 95.37 ± 12.08a |
Observation | 42 | 6.16 ± 1.15 | 10.21 ± 0.75a | 6.15 ± 1.12 | 10.12 ± 0.72a | 69.48 ± 9.03 | 116.51 ± 11.53a |
t | - | 0.081 | 7.808 | 0.121 | 7.561 | 0.061 | 8.204 |
P value | - | 0.936 | < 0.001 | 0.904 | < 0.001 | 0.952 | < 0.001 |
- Citation: Zhao X. Effect of three-stage fusion nursing intervention the rehabilitation process and psychological stress in patients after gastric cancer surgery. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17(7): 104226
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v17/i7/104226.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i7.104226