Minireviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Jun 27, 2025; 17(6): 105963
Published online Jun 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i6.105963
Table 2 Summary of endoscopic treatment for benign esophageal stenosis
Treatment methods
Applicable scenarios
Advantages
Disadvantages
DilationThe vast majority of benign esophageal stenosesThe first-choice treatment method with a wide range of applicable scenariosHigh recurrence rate after dilation, requiring repeated treatments
MedicationReflux-related stenosis or stenosis after ESDCan intervene in the early process of esophageal stenosis and has a certain preventive effectThe effect of drug alone is not definite and it is often used in combination with dilation and other methods
Stenosis incisionRefractory Schatzki ring and short-segment anastomotic stenosis (< 1 cm)Definite effect and good effect on annular stenosisDifficult to operate, high risk of perforation, and the scar after cutting is prone to causing restenosis
StentingRefractory or recurrent stenosis, sealing benign esophageal leaks and perforationsIt can control potential inflammation, and the scar tissue may also undergo remodeling, thus achieving continuous lumen patencyThe long-term effect of the stent is not good. About one-third of patients have a poor effect in terms of long-term relief of dysphagia, and the displacement rate is relatively high
Flap transplantationPrevention of stenosis after ESD for large-area esophageal lesionsSignificantly reduces the incidence of stenosis after endoscopic circumferential mucosal resection of the esophagus. Flap transplantation avoids repeated dilation of esophageal stenosis and damage to the esophagusIs a cutting-edge technology, less carried out, and requires relevant basic and clinical research for further verification