Comparison of three reconstruction techniques performed after pancreaticoduodenectomy: Using external, internal, or no stent

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 17, Issue 6

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

All Articles published online

Item

Count

PDF

HTML

Figures (1-2)

Tables (1-5)

Sum=113

Publishing Process of This Article

Item

Count

Browse

Download

Sum=19

Jun 27, 2025 (publication date) through Jun 2, 2025

Times Cited of This Article

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

ISSN

1948-9366

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Case Control Study

World J Gastrointest Surg. Jun 27, 2025; 17(6): 104652
Published online Jun 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i6.104652

Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 2 Flowchart of patient selection. PD: Pancreatoduodenectomy; EDS: External duct stent; IDS: Internal duct stent; NDS: Non-ductal stent.

Citation: Jiménez-Romero C, Marcacuzco-Quinto A, Caso-Maestro O, Alonso L, Fernández-Fernández C, Justo I. Comparison of three reconstruction techniques performed after pancreaticoduodenectomy: Using external, internal, or no stent. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17(6): 104652
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v17/i6/104652.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i6.104652