Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Jun 27, 2025; 17(6): 104325
Published online Jun 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i6.104325
Published online Jun 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i6.104325
Table 5 Comparison of adverse reactions and satisfaction between the two groups, n (%)
Group | Adverse reactions | Satisfaction | ||||||
Dry mouth | Diarrhea | Nausea | Total incidence | Satisfaction | Be satisfied with | Dissatisfy | Overall satisfaction | |
Integrated group (n = 100) | 2 (2.00) | 2 (2.00) | 1 (1.00) | 5 (5.00) | 46 (46.00) | 51 (51.00) | 3 (3.00) | 97 (97.00) |
Normal group (n = 96) | 5 (5.21) | 5 (5.21) | 4 (4.17) | 14 (14.58) | 32 (33.00) | 48 (50.00) | 15 (15.62) | 81 (84.38) |
t | 5.138 | 9.360 | ||||||
P value | 0.023 | 0.002 |
- Citation: Liang C, Qiu FX, Zhang XC, Hu QL. Effects of gastrointestinal motility therapy combined with acupuncture on gastrointestinal function in patients after laparoscopic radical surgery. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17(6): 104325
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v17/i6/104325.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i6.104325