Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. May 27, 2025; 17(5): 106384
Published online May 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i5.106384
Published online May 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i5.106384
Table 1 Comparison of basic data, n (%)/mean ± SD
Control group (n = 32) | Observation group (n = 34) | t/χ2 | P value | |
Sex | 0.391 | 0.532 | ||
Male | 23 (71.88) | 22 (64.71) | ||
Female | 9 (28.13) | 12 (35.29) | ||
Age | 59.22 ± 10.88 | 57.21 ± 10.48 | 0.766 | 0.447 |
BMI (kg/m2) | 22.83 ± 3.54 | 22.04 ± 2.62 | 1.033 | 0.306 |
ASA score | 0.121 | 0.728 | ||
I | 22 (68.75) | 22 (64.71) | ||
II | 10 (31.25) | 12 (35.29) | ||
Surgical time (minute) | 127.09 ± 21.26 | 129.79 ± 22.25 | 0.504 | 0.616 |
Gastrointestinal perforation location | 0.507 | 0.776 | ||
Gastroduodenum | 22 (68.75) | 26 (76.47) | ||
Small intestine | 4 (12.50) | 3 (8.82) | ||
Large intestine | 6 (18.75) | 5 (14.71) |
- Citation: Hu MM, Ding YL, Li J. Effectiveness of early enteral nutrition support in patients undergoing gastrointestinal perforation repair surgery within the enhanced recovery. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17(5): 106384
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v17/i5/106384.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i5.106384