Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. May 27, 2025; 17(5): 104043
Published online May 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i5.104043
Published online May 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i5.104043
Table 2 Outcomes of cannulation and procedural metrics
Variables | Dome tip (n = 43) | Tapered tip (n = 42) | P value1 |
Selective biliary cannulation success rate | 32/43 | 36/42 | 0.20 |
Difficult cannulation | 14/43 | 6/42 | 0.05 |
More than 5 contacts with the papilla | 5 | 2 | 0.93 |
More than 5 minutes spent attempting | 11 | 6 | 0.08 |
More than one unintended pancreatic duct cannulation or opacification | 3 | 2 | 0.62 |
Time to selective biliary cannulation (seconds) | 237.74 ± 252.36 | 188.7 ± 319.96 | 0.43 |
Number of papilla contacts | 3.03 ± 2.45 | 2.24 ± 2.17 | 0.37 |
Number of unintentional P duct cannulation | 0.47 ± 0.63 | 0.38 ± 0.58 | 0.53 |
Total procedure time (seconds) | 971.16 ± 367.13 | 808 ± 409.57 | 0.06 |
- Citation: Lee J, Park JS. Dome vs tapered tip sphincterotomes in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: A pilot study on cannulation success and postprocedural pancreatitis. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17(5): 104043
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v17/i5/104043.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i5.104043