Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. May 27, 2025; 17(5): 103758
Published online May 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i5.103758
Published online May 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i5.103758
Table 4 Results of subgroup analysis of studies - length of the operation
Study characteristics | Number of studies | Number of patients | OR (95%CI) | I2, % | P value |
Total | 20 | 3726 | 15.25 (10.71, 19.80) | 97 | < 0.00001 |
Study design | |||||
RCT | 4 | 547 | 21.59 (12.37, 30.80) | 97 | 0.13 |
CCS | 16 | 3179 | 13.02 (6.76, 19.28) | 98 | |
Reinforced anastomosis method | |||||
Trans-anal reinforcing | 5 | 410 | 12.01 (5.20, 18.82) | 97 | 0.25 |
Laparoscopic reinforcing | 15 | 3316 | 17.30 (11.25, 23.35) | 96 | |
Reinforcing suture | |||||
Interrupted suture | 6 | 959 | 2.58 (-7.02, 12.17) | 28 | 0.006 |
Continuous suture | 13 | 2473 | 17.87 (12.88, 22.86) | 98 | |
Prophylactic ileostomy | |||||
Yes | 3 | 452 | 1.95 (-8.84, 12.74) | 42 | 0.008 |
No | 17 | 3274 | 17.69 (13.23, 22.14) | 97 |
- Citation: Zhuang ZX, Zhang Y, Yang XY, Wang ZQ, Deng XB, Zhang MM. Efficacy of reinforcing sutures in preventing anastomotic leakage after surgery for rectal cancer: A systematic review and metaanalysis. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17(5): 103758
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v17/i5/103758.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i5.103758