©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Feb 27, 2025; 17(2): 101896
Published online Feb 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i2.101896
Published online Feb 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i2.101896
Table 2 Postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo classification), n (%)
| Complication grade | Simple closure (n = 40) | Omental patch (n = 40) | Partial gastrectomy (n = 40) |
| Grade I | 3 (7.5) | 2 (5) | 2 (5) |
| Grade II | 3 (7.5) | 3 (7.5) | 3 (7.5) |
| Grade III | 2 (5) | 1 (2.5) | 1 (2.5) |
| Grade IV | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (2.5) |
| Grade V | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| Total | 8 (20) | 6 (15) | 7 (17.5) |
- Citation: Pang YF, Shu L, Xia CW. Retrospective comparative study of different surgical methods for gastric ulcer perforation: Efficacy and postoperative complications. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17(2): 101896
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v17/i2/101896.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i2.101896