©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Dec 27, 2025; 17(12): 113586
Published online Dec 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i12.113586
Published online Dec 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i12.113586
Table 6 Currently available risk prediction models developed using artificial intelligence and machine learning for predicting esophagectomy related complications
| Ref. | Study size | Study design | Objective | Results |
| Bolourani et al[97], 2021 | 2037 | Retrospective | ML-based prediction model for early readmissions within 30 days following esophagectomy | ML model for clinical decision AUC: 0.72 |
| ML model for quality review of esophagectomy AUC: 0.74 | ||||
| van Kooten et al[98], 2022 | 4288 | Retrospective | ML methods for predicting postoperative complications following esophagectomy and development of a predictive model for anastomotic leakage and cardiopulmonary complications | The AUC of 0.619 for anastomotic leakage and 0.644 for pulmonary complications |
| Jung et al[99], 2023 | 604 | Retrospective | ML-based methods for predicting Clavien–Dindo grade IIIa or greater complications following esophagectomy | The AUC of neural network was 0.672 for overall Clavien-Dindo grade IIIa or higher morbidity, 0.695 for medical complications, and 0.653 for surgical complications |
| Klontzas et al[55], 2024 | 471 | Retrospective | ML model combining CT and clinical variables for predicting anastomotic leakage following esophagectomy | The model achieved an AUC of 0.792 |
- Citation: Parikh KS, Kumar A. Nomographic predictive models for complications after minimally invasive esophagectomy: Current status and future perspectives. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17(12): 113586
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v17/i12/113586.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i12.113586