©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Dec 27, 2025; 17(12): 113364
Published online Dec 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i12.113364
Published online Dec 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i12.113364
Table 4 Within-group comparisons of nutritional status
| Group | Indicator | Before intervention | After intervention | t/χ2 | P value |
| Observation group (n = 28) | CONUT > 2, n (%) | 15 (53.57) | 3 (10.71) | 11.790 | < 0.001 |
| PA (mean ± SD, mg/L) | 265.28 ± 52.31 | 141.56 ± 37.38a | 10.183 | < 0.001 | |
| Control group (n = 27) | CONUT > 2, n (%) | 21 (77.78) | 18 (66.67) | 0.831 | 0.362 |
| PA (mean ± SD, mg/L) | 265.74 ± 52.86 | 260.97 ± 61.84a | 0.310 | 0.758 |
- Citation: Ma HY, Chen YW, Liu X, Zhang MM, Tan BB. Modified Pingwei Baohe decoction improves postoperative recovery in gastric cancer patients. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17(12): 113364
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v17/i12/113364.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i12.113364