©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Dec 27, 2025; 17(12): 113364
Published online Dec 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i12.113364
Published online Dec 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i12.113364
Table 3 Between-group comparisons of nutritional status
| Group | Observation group (n = 28) | Control group (n = 27) | χ2/t | P value | ||
| CONUT, n (%) | Before intervention | > 2 points | 15 (53.57) | 21 (77.78) | 3.562 | 0.059 |
| ≤ 2 points | 13 (46.43) | 6 (22.22) | ||||
| After intervention | > 2 points | 3 (10.71) | 18 (66.67) | 18.232 | 0.000 | |
| ≤ 2 points | 25 (89.29) | 9 (33.33) | ||||
| PA (mean ± SD, mg/L) | Before intervention | 265.28 ± 52.31 | 265.74 ± 52.86 | 0.032 | 0.974 | |
| After intervention | 141.56 ± 37.38a | 260.97 ± 61.84a | 8.703 | 0.000 | ||
- Citation: Ma HY, Chen YW, Liu X, Zhang MM, Tan BB. Modified Pingwei Baohe decoction improves postoperative recovery in gastric cancer patients. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17(12): 113364
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v17/i12/113364.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i12.113364