©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Dec 27, 2025; 17(12): 112175
Published online Dec 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i12.112175
Published online Dec 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i12.112175
Figure 1 Incidence rates and patient demographics of unplanned extubation across study cohort and literature X-comparison.
This ratio reflected the occurrence rates and patient distribution of unplanned extubation in various study groups, and it suggested that compared with the maximum incidence rate (25%) reported in the literature the modeling group (6.11%) and validation group (6.12%) had a significantly reduced unplanned extubation incidence. A: The comparative incidence rates are summarized; B: The actual number of patients in each group included 687 patients in the model group (42 for unplanned, 645 for normal extubation) and 294 patients in the validation group (18 for unplanned, 276 for normal extubation). aP < 0.05.
- Citation: Li WJ, Mi N, Huang X, Liu CS, Zhang ST, Liao Y, Yu Y. Predicting unplanned extubation risk in patients with endoscopic nasobiliary drainage. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17(12): 112175
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v17/i12/112175.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i12.112175