©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Dec 27, 2025; 17(12): 111864
Published online Dec 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i12.111864
Published online Dec 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i12.111864
Table 5 Comparison of nutritional status of the two groups, mean ± SD
| Item | Body mass index (kg/m2) | Upper arm muscle circumference (cm) | Triceps skinfold thickness(cm) | |||
| IgG | IgM | IgG | IgM | IgG | IgM | |
| Control group | 19.76 ± 3.18 | 18.96 ± 2.98 | 20.11 ± 4.09 | 20.03 ± 3.77 | 1.03 ± 0.11 | 0.87 ± 0.13 |
| Observation group | 19.81 ± 3.02 | 19.43 ± 2.76 | 20.01 ± 3.98 | 19.95 ± 3.84 | 1.01 ± 0.12 | 0.94 ± 0.06 |
| t value | -0.317 | -2.997 | 0.968 | 0.752 | 0.912 | 2.007 |
| P value | 0.809 | 0.008 | 0.253 | 0.421 | 0.287 | 0.041 |
- Citation: Liu LH, Wu SB, Zhou LY, Cai LL, Cao CP, Huang Y. Effect of early stepwise nutrition management on feeding tolerance of postoperative patients with gastric cancer. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17(12): 111864
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v17/i12/111864.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i12.111864