©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Dec 27, 2025; 17(12): 111481
Published online Dec 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i12.111481
Published online Dec 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i12.111481
Table 5 Comparison of diagnostic performance of intestinal ultrasound parameters with endoscopic findings (Rutgeerts score) in postoperative Crohn’s disease
| Ref. | Year | Sample size | IUS parameters | Reference standard | Agreement (κ) | AUROC | Sensitivity | Specificity | Key findings |
| Yebra Carmona et al[11] | 2022 | 39 | BWT > 3 mm + Limberg score > 1 | Rutgeerts ≥ i2 | 0.5 | 0.75 | 81.0% | 87.0% | IUS had higher diagnostic accuracy than clinical or lab parameters. |
| Macedo et al[18] | 2022 | 39 | BWT > 3 mm and/or Limberg score > 1 | Rutgeerts ≥ i2 | 0.5 | 0.75 | 88.9% | 61.9% | Loss of wall stratification and hyperemia were most predictive of recurrence. |
- Citation: Pal P, Kata P, Mateen MA, Gupta R, Tandan M, Duvvur NR. Intestinal ultrasound for monitoring postoperative Crohn’s disease: A systematic review and clinical implications. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17(12): 111481
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v17/i12/111481.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i12.111481