©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Dec 27, 2025; 17(12): 111268
Published online Dec 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i12.111268
Published online Dec 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i12.111268
Figure 2 Forest plots.
A and B: Clinical success and mortality based on single-group intervention studies (A: Clinical success; B: Mortality); C and D: Rebleeding based on single-group intervention studies (C: Fixed-effects model; D: Random-effects model); E and F: Reinterventions based on single-group intervention studies (E: Embolization-related interventional methods category: Transcatheter embolization/embolization procedures; F: Non-embolization-dominated interventional methods category: Over-the-scope clip/endoscopic treatment/transcatheter arterial embolization); G and H: Successful initial hemostasis and mortality (G: Successful initial hemostasis; H: Mortality); I and J: Rebleeding based on randomized controlled trials and retrospective cohort studies (I: Fixed-effects model; J: Random-effects model).
- Citation: Zhou CJ, Sun H, Tang XH. Endoscopic hemostasis combined with vascular interventional therapy for acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: A meta-analysis. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17(12): 111268
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v17/i12/111268.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i12.111268