©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Nov 27, 2025; 17(11): 111619
Published online Nov 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i11.111619
Published online Nov 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i11.111619
Table 3 Comparison of bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection trend from Japan scores between bleeding group and non-bleeding group in patients with early esophageal cancer
| Item | Bleeding group (n = 29) | Non-bleeding group (n = 149) | t/χ2 | P value |
| BEST-J score (points) | 1.97 ± 1.12 | 1.55 ± 0.93 | 2.829 | 0.005 |
| BEST-J score distribution, n (%) | 11.494 | 0.042 | ||
| 0 | 1 (3.45) | 12 (8.05) | ||
| 1 | 8 (27.59) | 77 (51.68) | ||
| 2 | 15 (51.72) | 47 (31.54) | ||
| 3 | 2 (6.90) | 10 (6.71) | ||
| 4 | 2 (6.90) | 2 (1.34) | ||
| 5 | 1 (3.45) | 1 (0.67) | ||
| BEST-J risk, n (%) | 9.025 | 0.029 | ||
| Low risk | 9 (31.03) | 89 (59.73) | ||
| Medium risk | 15 (51.72) | 47 (31.54) | ||
| High risk | 4 (13.79) | 12 (8.05) | ||
| Extremely high risk | 1 (3.45) | 1 (0.67) |
- Citation: Liu SN, Chen Z. Clinical value of predicting bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection for early esophageal cancer. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17(11): 111619
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v17/i11/111619.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i11.111619