©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Nov 27, 2025; 17(11): 110551
Published online Nov 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i11.110551
Published online Nov 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i11.110551
Table 2 Overview of relevant randomized controlled trials
| Ref. | Study design | Participants | Intervention | Control | Results |
| Luo et al[54], 2016 | Multicentre, single-blinded, randomised controlled trial | Patients with native papilla undergoing ERCP at six centres in China | All patients received 100 mg rectal indometacin within 30 min before ERCP | High-risk patients received rectal indometacin immediately after ERCP | 4% pancreatitis in universal indometacin group vs 8% in risk-stratified group (relative risk = 0.47; 95%CI: 0.34-0.66; P < 0.0001) |
| Fogel et al[57], 2020 | Randomised, double-blind, comparative effectiveness trial | High-risk patients from six tertiary medical centres in the United States | Standard-dose group received two 50 mg indometacin suppositories and a placebo suppository; high-dose group received three 50 mg indometacin suppositories and an additional 50 mg suppository 4 hours after procedure | - | 15% pancreatitis in standard-dose group vs 12% in high-dose group (risk ratio = 1.19, 95%CI: 0.87-1.61; P = 0.32) |
| Mok et al[72], 2017 | Randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial | High-risk patients | Four groups: Normal saline + placebo, normal saline + indometacin, lactated Ringer's + placebo, lactated Ringer's + indometacin | - | 6% pancreatitis in lactated Ringer's + indometacin group vs 21% in normal saline + placebo group (P = 0.04) |
| Patel et al[67], 2022 | Randomised controlled trial | High-risk patients | Aggressive infusion of lactated Ringer's or normal saline | - | 4% pancreatitis in lactated Ringer's group vs 11% in normal saline group (relative risk = 0.38, 95%CI: 0.10-1.42; P = 0.19) |
| Concepción-Martín et al[76], 2014 | Randomised, double-blind trial | Patients undergoing ERCP at a single centre | Intravenous bolus of somatostatin followed by a 4-hour continuous infusion | Similar placebo regimen | 7.5% pancreatitis in somatostatin group vs 6.7% in placebo group (relative risk = 1.12, 95%CI: 0.59-2.1; P = 0.73) |
| Wang et al[77], 2013 | Randomised, placebo-controlled pilot trial | Patients scheduled for ERCP | Pre-ERCP somatostatin (0.5 mg/hour for 24 hours, starting 1 hour before ERCP), post-ERCP somatostatin (0.5 mg/hour for 24 hours, starting 1 hour after ERCP), or placebo (saline for 24 hours, starting 1 hour before ERCP) | - | 16.7% pancreatitis in pre-ERCP somatostatin group, 10.6% in post-ERCP somatostatin group, 14.6% in placebo group (P = 0.715) |
| Norouzi et al[101], 2023 | Double-blind randomised placebo-controlled clinical trial | High-risk patients | 100 mg rectal indometacin + 250 g somatostatin bolus followed by 500 g infusion for 2 hours | 100 mg rectal indometacin + placebo | 11.4% pancreatitis in intervention group vs 15.2% in control group (P = 0.666) |
| Yoo et al[102], 2011 | Prospective, randomised, double-blind, controlled trial | Patients undergoing ERCP | Intravenous nafamostat mesilate 60 min before and for 6 hours after ERCP | Placebo | 2.8% pancreatitis in nafamostat group vs 9.1% in placebo group (P = 0.03) |
- Citation: Zhao WY, Zhao JW, Yu L, Yu ZY. Post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: Mechanistic pathways, diagnostic benchmarks, and emerging and mitochondria-targeted therapies. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17(11): 110551
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v17/i11/110551.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i11.110551