©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Nov 27, 2025; 17(11): 110501
Published online Nov 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i11.110501
Published online Nov 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i11.110501
Table 1 Elective cholecystectomy vs expectant management in asymptomatic gallstone disease
| Parameter | Prophylactic surgery | Expectant management |
| Risk of complications | Low when elective; increases in elderly/comorbid patients | Low initially; increases with time in high-risk patients |
| Clinical risk | Large solitary stone; ≥ 10 mm polyp/rapid growth, calcified non-functioning gall bladder, haemolysis, immunosuppression | Small stones without high-risk features; low comorbidity; reliable access to urgent care |
| Quality of life impact | Can be improved in symptomatic or high-risk patients | Stable; may decrease if complications |
| Risk of gallbladder cancer | Lower in selected high-risk groups (e.g., solitary large stones) | Higher in endemic areas with large stones or familial risk |
| Cost-effectiveness | More cost-effective in high-risk, elderly patients | More cost-saving in young, low-risk patients with very good follow-up |
| Postoperative complications | Bile duct injury, diarrhoea, dyspepsia (1%-5%), possible | None at first, but the danger of emergency surgery complications |
- Citation: Sasmal PK, Singh PK, Sahoo A, Dutta T. Asymptomatic gallstone disease: Re-evaluating the threshold for surgical options in the era of precision medicine. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17(11): 110501
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v17/i11/110501.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i11.110501