BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Retrospective Study
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Nov 27, 2025; 17(11): 110490
Published online Nov 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i11.110490
Table 1 Clinical characteristics of patients with perforated gastric cancer according to initial surgical approach - primary perforation repair and one-stage gastrectomy groups
Variables
Primary perforation repair, n = 26
One-stage gastrectomy, n = 10
P value
Sex, n (%)0.722
    Female11 (42.3)5 (50)
    Male15 (57.7)5 (50)
Age (years)61 ± 13.466.5 ± 11.30.263
Body mass index (kg/m²)21.1 ± 4.623.5 ± 3.00.145
Hemoglobin (g/dL)10.5 ± 2.310.2 ± 2.40.736
    < 11, n (%)17 (65.4)7 (70)1.0
Albumin (g/dL), n (%)3.0 (0.9)3.2 (0.7)0.492
    < 3.516 (61.5)6 (60)1.000
Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio1.92 ± 1.152.56 ± 1.160.145
Charlson-Deyo comorbidity index, n (%)0.688
    019 (73.1)6 (60)
    ≥ 17 (26.9)4 (40)
American Society of Anesthesiologists, n (%)0.260
    I/II9 (34.6)6 (60)
    III/IV17 (65.4)4 (40)
Tumor location, n (%)0.709
    Distal third9 (34.6)5 (50)
    Middle third4 (15.4)1 (10)
    Proximal third9 (34.6)4 (40)
    Linite plastica4 (15.4)0 (0)
Lauren type, n (%)0.024
    Intestinal12 (46.2)9 (90)
    Diffuse/mixed14 (53.8)1 (10)
Histological tumor grade, n (%)0.014
    Well/moderately differentiated4 (15.4)6 (60)
    Poorly differentiated22 (84.6)4 (40)


Write to the Help Desk