BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Systematic Reviews
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Nov 27, 2025; 17(11): 109989
Published online Nov 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i11.109989
Table 6 Methodological quality (Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews 2 assessment)
Ref.
Confidence rating
Key strengths
Key limitations
Safiejko et al[6]ModerateDirect RLR vs LLR comparisonRetrospective dominance, no RCTs
Machairas et al[7]LowFocus on SRARSmall cohort, no comparator group
Mkabaah et al[9]HighLarge sample, subgroup analysesHeterogeneity in study designs
Ho et al[12]LowEarly RLR adoption dataOutdated, mixed malignancies included
McGuirk et al[13]LowDetailed technical insightsSmall sample, case series bias


Write to the Help Desk