BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Home / Archive / Volume 17, Issue 11
  • This Article
Peer-Review Report of This Article
CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article
Academic Rules and Norms of This Article
Citation of this article
Corresponding Author of This Article
Research Domain of This Article
Article-Type of This Article
Open-Access Policy of This Article
Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article
Journal Information of This Article
Publication Name
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
ISSN
1948-9366
Publisher of This Article
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Systematic Reviews
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Nov 27, 2025; 17(11): 109989
Published online Nov 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i11.109989
Table 1 Overview of included systematic reviews
Ref.
Year
No. of studies
Patients (RLR, LLR, OLR)
Study designs
Key focus
Safiejko et al[6]202483210 (530, 2680, N/A)1 prospective, 6 retrospective, 1 randomizedRLR vs LLR intraoperative/postoperative
Machairas et al[7]2021929 (29, N/A, N/A)Case seriesSimultaneous robotic resections
Mkabaah et al[9]2025136582 (268, 3333, 2981)2 RCTs, 1 prospective, 10 retrospectivesComparative outcomes of RLR, LLR, OLR
Ho et al[12]201319217 (142, 43, 32)10 case series, 2 comparative, 7 case reportsEarly RLR adoption and complications
McGuirk et al[13]2021828 (28, N/A, N/A)Case seriesTechnical feasibility of RLR
RLR: Robotic liver resection; LLR: Laparoscopic liver resection; OLR: Open liver resection; N/A: Not applicable.
Full Size Table
Write to the Help Desk
Copyright © 1993-2026 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA. All rights reserved, including rights relating to text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies. For open-access content, the applicable copyright and licensing terms govern.