©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Nov 27, 2025; 17(11): 109426
Published online Nov 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i11.109426
Published online Nov 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i11.109426
Table 5 Risk of bias assessment of the included studies according to the Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized controlled trials
| Ref. | Selection bias1 | Selection bias2 | Performance bias | Attrition bias | Detection bias | Reporting bias | Overall bias |
| Abdelshafy et al[28] | Some concern | Low | Some concern | Low | Low | Some concern | Some concerns |
| Lee et al[30] | Some concern | Some concern | Low | Low | Low | High | Low |
| Jian et al[42] | Low | Low | High | Low | Some concern | Some concern | Some concerns |
| Ruiz-Tovar et al[47] | Low | Low | Some concerns | Some concerns | Some concerns | Low | Some concerns |
| Seetharamaiah et al[49] | Low | Some concerns | Some concerns | Some concerns | Some concerns | Low | Some concerns |
| Shivakumar et al[51] | Low | Low | Some concerns | Some concerns | Low | Low | Low |
- Citation: Mirghani HO. One-anastomosis gastric bypass vs sleeve gastrectomy for diabetes remission and weight loss: A meta-analysis. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17(11): 109426
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v17/i11/109426.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i11.109426