©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Nov 27, 2025; 17(11): 109426
Published online Nov 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i11.109426
Published online Nov 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i11.109426
Table 3 Excess weight loss following one-anastomosis gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy at 1-year post-surgery, mean ± SD/n
| Ref. | Country | Study type | OAGB, 1 year | SG, 1 year | OAGB, 3 years | SG, 3 years | OAGB, 5 years | SG, 5 years |
| Musella et al[24] | Italy | Retrospective | 64.7 ± 22.9/96 | 52.4 ± 18.3/110 | 22.8 ± 5.9/96 | 20.1 ± 5.3/110 | ||
| Abdel-Rahim et al[26] | Egypt | Prospective | 95.11 ± 7.00/20 | 78.48 ± 19.07/20 | ||||
| Dayan et al[29] | Israel | Retrospective | 67.2 ± 22.3/41 | 45.8 ± 18.0/83 | ||||
| Lee et al[30] | Taiwan | Trial | 78.2 ± 19.7/519 | 68.7 ± 30.3/519 | ||||
| Madhok et al[31] | United Kingdom | Retrospective | 58.0 ± 7.75/19 | 45 ± 21.5/56 | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Milone et al[32] | Italy | Prospective | 24.19 ± 4.42/16 | 24.33 ± 4.48/15 | ||||
| Alkhalifah et al[36] | Taiwan | Prospective | 84.5 ± 35.2/533 | 64.8 ± 34.3/205 | ||||
| Catro et al[37] | Spain | Retrospective | 72.5 ± 16.4/123 | 68.8 ± 18.6/83 | ||||
| Das et al[38] | United Kingdom | Retrospective | 50.2 ± 28.6/19 | 49.9 ± 19.5/26 | ||||
| Gambardella et al[40] | Italy | Prospective | 83.6 ± 18.1/60 | 74.3 ± 13.8/131 | ||||
| Jain et al[42] | India | Trial | 65.9 ± 10.9/101 | 64.8 ± 14.3/100 | 67.5 ± 16.6/101 | 61 ± 26.4/100 | 65.3 ± 13.9/101 | 55.9 ± 27/100 |
| Kansou et al[43] | France | Retrospective | 79.3 ± 17.8/136 | 71.4 ± 19 /136 | ||||
| Kular et al[44] | India | Retrospective | 63 ± 21.2/104 | 69 ± 22.5/118 | 70 ± 22.6/104 | 61 ± 26.4/118 | 68 ± 24/104 | 51.2 ± 23/118 |
| Plamper et al[46] | Germany | Retrospective | 66.2 ± 13/169 | 57.3 ± 19/118 | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Ruiz-Tovar et al[47] | Spain | Trial | 97.9 ± 7/70 | 76.3 ± 6/61 | ||||
| Schmitz et al[48] | Germany | Retrospective | 36 ± 0.8/150 | 29 ± 1.2/93 | 42.5 ± 1.9 | 32.4 ± 2.7 | ||
| Seetharamaiah et al[49] | India | Trial | 66.87 ± 10.87/101 | 63.97 ± 13.24/100 | ||||
| Shivakumar et al[51] | India | Trial | 66.2 ± 10.9/101 | 63.9 ± 13.5/100 | 66.5 ± 15.7/93 | 61.2 ± 25.2/92 | ||
| Singla et al[52] | India | Retrospective | 74.57 ± 13.2/75 | 56.20 ± 18.9/75 | ||||
| Toh et al[54] | Singapore | Retrospective | 68 ± 28.5/40 | 61.2 ± 20/195 | 66.2 ± 35.6/31 | 47.9 ± 22.8/53 | 65.2 ± 27.5/8 | 47.3 ± 27.5/15 |
| Vrakopoulou et al[55] | Greece | Retrospective | 98.2 ± 29.0/115 | 79.7 ± 14.5/437 | ||||
| Sari et al[57] | Turkey | Retrospective | 77.66 ± 30.55/62 | 71.11 ± 27.81/129 | ||||
| Yang et al[58] | Taiwan | Prospective | 72 ± 20/89 | 67.2 ± 18.4/32 |
- Citation: Mirghani HO. One-anastomosis gastric bypass vs sleeve gastrectomy for diabetes remission and weight loss: A meta-analysis. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17(11): 109426
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v17/i11/109426.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i11.109426