©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Oct 27, 2025; 17(10): 109729
Published online Oct 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i10.109729
Published online Oct 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i10.109729
Table 7 Comparison of complication rates between the two groups, n (%)
| Group | n | Intraoperative iatrogenic injuries | Chylothorax | Anastomotic fistula | Massive hemorrhage | Pleural effusion | Infections in the lungs and other systems | Overall incidence |
| Observation group | 66 | 0 (0) | 2 (3.03) | 1 (1.52) | 0 (0) | 2 (3.03) | 1 (1.52) | 6 (7.58) |
| Control group | 61 | 2 (3.28) | 2 (3.28) | 4 (6.56) | 2 (3.28) | 1 (1.64) | 2 (3.28) | 13 (21.31) |
| χ2 | 4.917 | |||||||
| P value | 0.027 |
- Citation: Zhang TY, Ren MZ, Gong XK, Ma J. Application of total thoracoscopic ultrasonic scalpel resection in esophageal cancer patients. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17(10): 109729
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v17/i10/109729.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i10.109729