©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Oct 27, 2025; 17(10): 109729
Published online Oct 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i10.109729
Published online Oct 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i10.109729
Table 6 Comparison of pulmonary function parameters between the two groups, mean ± SD, mL
| Group | n | FVC | FEV1 | MVV | |||
| Preoperatively | Postoperatively | Preoperatively | Postoperatively | Preoperatively | Postoperatively | ||
| Observation group | 66 | 95.45 ± 8.46 | 78.28 ± 7.75a | 89.49 ± 9.11 | 76.68 ± 6.41a | 86.68 ± 9.21 | 68.49 ± 7.11a |
| Control group | 61 | 96.02 ± 10.21 | 62.43 ± 5.33a | 88.32 ± 8.46 | 66.50 ± 5.78a | 85.12 ± 8.78 | 56.37 ± 6.44a |
| t | 0.344 | 13.323 | 0.748 | 9.372 | 0.975 | 10.040 | |
| P value | 0.732 | < 0.001 | 0.456 | < 0.001 | 0.331 | < 0.001 | |
- Citation: Zhang TY, Ren MZ, Gong XK, Ma J. Application of total thoracoscopic ultrasonic scalpel resection in esophageal cancer patients. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17(10): 109729
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v17/i10/109729.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i10.109729