©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Oct 27, 2025; 17(10): 109729
Published online Oct 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i10.109729
Published online Oct 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i10.109729
Table 3 Comparison of pain mediator levels between the two groups, mean ± SD
| Group | n | 5-HT (nmol/L) | K+ (nmol/L) | NE (ng/L) | |||
| Preoperatively | Postoperatively | Preoperatively | Postoperatively | Preoperatively | Postoperatively | ||
| Observation group | 66 | 0.22 ± 0.04 | 0.41 ± 0.04a | 28.35 ± 2.40 | 33.69 ± 2.58a | 1.25 ± 0.11 | 3.03 ± 0.48a |
| Control group | 61 | 0.21 ± 0.03 | 0.69 ± 0.05a | 27.94 ± 2.33 | 38.86 ± 3.71a | 1.27 ± 0.16 | 5.78 ± 0.52a |
| t | 1.584 | 34.973 | 0.975 | 9.174 | 0.826 | 30.992 | |
| P value | 0.114 | < 0.001 | 0.331 | < 0.001 | 0.410 | < 0.001 | |
- Citation: Zhang TY, Ren MZ, Gong XK, Ma J. Application of total thoracoscopic ultrasonic scalpel resection in esophageal cancer patients. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17(10): 109729
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v17/i10/109729.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i10.109729