BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Retrospective Study
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Oct 27, 2025; 17(10): 109407
Published online Oct 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i10.109407
Table 4 Comparative analysis of catheter displacement and occlusion complications
Parameter
Experimental group (n = 103)
Control group (n = 113)
Statistics
P value
Incidence rate
Catheter displacement1.6% (2/103)5.7% (6/113)χ2 = 2.4170.03a
Catheter occlusion1.6% (2/103)4.1% (5/113)χ2 = 1.0370.309
Displacement characteristics
Time of occurrence (months)2.7 ± 0.31.3 ± 0.5t = 6.32< 0.001b
Minor displacement (< 2 cm)100% (2/2)66.7% (4/6)χ2 = 1.1430.285
Major displacement (> 3 cm)0% (0/2)33.3% (2/6)χ2 = 1.1430.285
Adjusted under X-ray100% (2/2)66.7% (4/6)χ2 = 1.1430.285
Required surgical replacement0% (0/2)33.3% (2/6)χ2 = 1.1430.285
Occlusion characteristics
Chemotherapy-related100% (2/2)40% (2/5)χ2 = 2.5000.114
Related to inadequate flushing0% (0/2)60% (3/5)χ2 = 3.3330.068
Recovered with urokinase100% (2/2)80% (4/5)χ2 = 0.5560.456
Required catheter replacement0% (0/2)20% (1/5)χ2 = 0.5560.456


Write to the Help Desk