©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Oct 27, 2025; 17(10): 107935
Published online Oct 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i10.107935
Published online Oct 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i10.107935
Table 1 Comparison of postoperative recovery between the two groups, mean ± SD
| Group | n | First time out of bed | First exhaust time | Time of first feeding |
| Control | 40 | 2.78 ± 0.65 | 2.13 ± 0.59 | 2.81 ± 0.55 |
| Observation | 40 | 2.09 ± 0.57 | 1.51 ± 0.36 | 1.95 ± 0.41 |
| t | - | 5.048 | 5.673 | 7.929 |
| P value | - | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
| Group | n | Time of bowel song recovery | The time of catheter extraction | Length of stay |
| Control | 40 | 1.71 ± 0.44 | 1.73 ± 0.39 | 11.38 ± 2.69 |
| Observation | 40 | 1.29 ± 0.37 | 1.42 ± 0.26 | 9.45 ± 2.01 |
| t | - | 4.621 | 4.183 | 3.635 |
| P value | - | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
- Citation: Chen LY. Impact of Neuman model-guided stepped care on elderly gastric cancer patients’ postop recovery. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17(10): 107935
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v17/i10/107935.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i10.107935