©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Jan 27, 2025; 17(1): 101204
Published online Jan 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i1.101204
Published online Jan 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i1.101204
Table 2 Comparison of intraoperative and postoperative conditions between the two groups of patients
| Item | Operation time (min) | Intraoperative blood loss (mL) | Retrieved lymph nodes (n) | Time to first exhaust (d) | Time to intake of first soft diet (d) | Postoperative hospital stay (d) | Digestive tract reconstruction time (minute) | Surgical costs (thousands) |
| LPG-DCA (n = 33) | 248.80 ± 56.48 | 140.85 ± 44.23 | 34.74 ± 4.89 | 3.72 ± 0.49 | 6.03 ± 2.00 | 15.32 ± 2.98 | 39.74 ± 5.87 | 59.09 ± 11.15 |
| LPG-TGA (n = 30) | 239.63 ± 49.57 | 129.53 ± 35.57 | 32.41 ± 5.13 | 3.55 ± 0.36 | 5.29 ± 1.68 | 14.07 ± 2.75 | 37.44 ± 5.04 | 58.32 ± 9.51 |
| t value | 0.682 | 1.112 | 1.839 | 1.598 | 1.583 | 1.719 | 1.657 | 0.292 |
| P value | 0.498 | 0.271 | 0.071 | 0.115 | 0.119 | 0.091 | 0.103 | 0.771 |
- Citation: Wang M, Zhang LL, Wang G, Miao YC, Zhang T, Qiu L, Fang GD, Lu F, Xu DL, Yu P. Comparative study of clinical efficacy of laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double-channel anastomosis and tubular gastroesophageal anastomosis. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17(1): 101204
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v17/i1/101204.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i1.101204