Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Jun 27, 2023; 15(6): 1116-1124
Published online Jun 27, 2023. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i6.1116
Table 4 The findings of computed tomography scan on presentation and abdominal X-ray following administration of water-soluble contrast medium in both groups, n (%)

Group A (n = 90)
Group B (n = 162)
OR (95%CI)
P value
Definitive transition point85 (94.4)140 (86.4)2.67 (0.975-7.318)0.048
No transition point5 (5.6)22 (13.6)
Mesenteric stranding64 (71.1)96 (59.3)1.69 (0.973-2.942)0.061
No mesenteric stranding26 (28.9)66 (40.7)
Small bowel thickening12 (13.3)13 (8.0)1.76 (0.768-4.084)0.177
No small bowel thickening78 (86.7)149 (92)
Water-soluble contrast medium42 (46.7)98 (60.5)0.55 (0.323-0.936)0.024
Did not receive water-soluble contrast medium47 (53.3)60 (39.5)
Presence of free fluid72 (80)106 (65.4)2.11 (1.149-3.888)0.015
No free fluid18 (20)56 (34.6)
No small bowel faecal sign42 (46.7)55 (34.0)1.70 (1.005-2.882)0.047
Small bowel faecal sign present48 (53.3)107 (66.0)
Contrast reaches small bowel only23 (25.6)34 (21.0)3.83 (1.790- 8.209)10.001
Contrast reach large bowel19 (74.4)76 (79.0)
Grade of obstruction (proximal small bowel diameter in mm), mean ± SD36.87 ± 7.5337.35 ± 6.770.601