Copyright
©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Dec 27, 2023; 15(12): 2765-2773
Published online Dec 27, 2023. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i12.2765
Published online Dec 27, 2023. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i12.2765
Table 5 Comparison of anal pressure indicators between observational and control groups (mmHg, mean ± SD)
| Group | n | Anal resting pressure | Rectal defecation threshold | Maximum tolerance volume | |||
| Before treatment | After 4 wk of treatment | Before treatment | After 4 wk of treatment | Before treatment | After 4 wk of treatment | ||
| Observation al group | 25 | 49.51 ± 3.53 | 59.73 ± 2.12a | 85.32 ± 3.34 | 115.54 ± 5.62a | 122.35 ± 9.84 | 134.12 ± 7.82a |
| Control group | 25 | 49.34 ± 3.62 | 54.41 ± 2.86a | 85.09 ± 3.62 | 107.31 ± 6.49a | 120.18 ± 10.45 | 128.36 ± 11.41a |
| T value | 0.168 | 7.472 | 0.233 | 4.793 | 0.756 | 2.082 | |
| P value | 0.867 | 0.000 | 0.816 | 0.000 | 0.453 | 0.043 | |
- Citation: Xu LL, Xiang NJ, Cheng TC, Li YX, Chen P, Jiang ZW, Liu XX. Application of electroacupuncture in the prevention of low anterior resection syndrome after rectal cancer surgery. World J Gastrointest Surg 2023; 15(12): 2765-2773
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v15/i12/2765.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v15.i12.2765