©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Jan 27, 2023; 15(1): 94-104
Published online Jan 27, 2023. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i1.94
Published online Jan 27, 2023. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i1.94
Table 1 Single-factor analysis of endoscopic submucosal dissection operation time
| Factors | n | Operation time (min) (mean ± SD) | r/t/F | P value |
| Age (yr) | 520 | 66.78 ± 40.89 | 0. 191 | 0.812 |
| Sex | 0.311 | 0.764 | ||
| Male | 367 | 64.19 ± 41.21 | ||
| Female | 153 | 73.38 ± 35.82 | ||
| Underlying diseases | 0.921 | 0.146 | ||
| None | 379 | 63.11 ± 27.17 | ||
| Hypertension | 126 | 70.91 ± 32.19 | ||
| Diabetes | 12 | 67.24 ± 41.65 | ||
| Cirrhosis | 3 | 78.55 ± 30.52 | ||
| History of taking anticoagulant or antiplatelet drugs | 1.260 | 0.262 | ||
| Yes | 31 | 59.51 ± 48.44 | ||
| No | 489 | 66.12 ± 20.38 | ||
| Lesion location | 1.333 | 0.198 | ||
| Upper gastric body | 112 | 75.76 ± 31.76 | ||
| Middle gastric body | 70 | 63.36 ± 38.91 | ||
| Lower gastric body | 338 | 65.54 ± 39.18 | ||
| Maximum diameter of lesion | 8.691 | < 0.001 | ||
| < 3.00 cm | 351 | 52.22 ± 29.81 | ||
| ≥ 3.00 cm | 169 | 90.38 ± 40.21 | ||
| Lesion form | 11.123 | < 0.001 | ||
| Uplift type | 134 | 48.54 ± 28.11 | ||
| Flat type | 138 | 53.66 ± 31.81 | ||
| Concave type | 91 | 71.17 ± 33.71 | ||
| Mixed type | 157 | 109.33 ± 40.28 | ||
| Combined ulcer or scar | 7.288 | 0.001 | ||
| Yes | 64 | 93.17 ± 37.34 | ||
| No | 456 | 62.36 ± 31.97 | ||
| Combined perforation | 9.327 | < 0.001 | ||
| Yes | 21 | 121.33 ± 41.19 | ||
| No | 499 | 63.17 ± 36.85 | ||
| Infiltrative depth | 5.442 | 0.017 | ||
| Mucosa | 397 | 55.44 ± 36.18 | ||
| Submucosa | 123 | 87.23 ± 39.67 |
- Citation: Cai RS, Yang WZ, Cui GR. Associate factors for endoscopic submucosal dissection operation time and postoperative delayed hemorrhage of early gastric cancer. World J Gastrointest Surg 2023; 15(1): 94-104
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v15/i1/94.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v15.i1.94